Opening
Hello. Today we will discuss a topic concerning Dracula's innocence concerning Lucy's death. Lucy was in fact bit by Dracula multiple times, but has no concrete evidence toward causing Lucy's death. Lucy could have died many times, but was saved by the accusers. Not only this, but Dracula was no where to be found at the time of death. The people that were around were in fact the accusers. Also, if the accusers had cared so much about Lucy, then they would've taken better care for Lucy. Lucy wanted blood, but after a few blood donations, they stopped. Leaving her to die.
mother takes garlic off of her
Van helsing doesn't allow him to kiss Lucy even if he wanted to give blood
Seward could've helped Lucy to take garlic off, knowing that it was annoying her
page 146 "not for your living soul and hers”
had you not said (above) to arthur on page 146 about lucy?
But didn't the two bite marks disappear? doesn't that mean that it healed?
Hello. Today we will discuss a topic concerning Dracula's innocence concerning Lucy's death. Lucy was in fact bit by Dracula multiple times, but has no concrete evidence toward causing Lucy's death. Lucy could have died many times, but was saved by the accusers. Not only this, but Dracula was no where to be found at the time of death. The people that were around were in fact the accusers. Also, if the accusers had cared so much about Lucy, then they would've taken better care for Lucy. Lucy wanted blood, but after a few blood donations, they stopped. Leaving her to die.
mother takes garlic off of her
Van helsing doesn't allow him to kiss Lucy even if he wanted to give blood
Seward could've helped Lucy to take garlic off, knowing that it was annoying her
page 146 "not for your living soul and hers”
had you not said (above) to arthur on page 146 about lucy?
But didn't the two bite marks disappear? doesn't that mean that it healed?